RE: http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,122086,00.html


Didn't think we still lived like Puritans with prurient thinking. Sad. She is beautiful. Playboy only made her more attractive. Good luck Seargent Manhart.

Deja vu, all over again.

Where you been? Welcome to 2008!

Disclaimer - I haven't seen the Playboy article/photos. Just going by the AP story, though, she screwed up by posing in uniform and by making a point of her Air Force service. If the only mention of it had been "Occupation: Airman" on the back of the centerfold, then she'd have been fine.

Nonetheless, I'd be interested in seeing the actual charges - can they come up with anything better than "Conduct Unbecoming"?

Oh, good lord - not again.........

gee wizz wally. It simply appears that StPete is living in the past. NOTE the article is from Jan 13 2007 and NOT 2008.

Hey PETE!! fast forward 12 months and get with the program! THIS IS 2008

quote:

Originally posted by BobApril:
Disclaimer - I haven't seen the Playboy article/photos. Just going by the AP story, though, she screwed up by posing in uniform and by making a point of her Air Force service. If the only mention of it had been "Occupation: Airman" on the back of the centerfold, then she'd have been fine.

Nonetheless, I'd be interested in seeing the actual charges - can they come up with anything better than "Conduct Unbecoming"?

If you check it out Bob, she retired from the Air Force, no charges. Her pics are now splattered all over the internet - Google her name. I hope she can dance because those photos and $4.68 will get her a latte. And so much for her service career, pension and bennies.

See Flanker's post above. We're not brilliant, the 'news' is a year 'old'.

PS I don't think she made the big picture.

quote:

Originally posted by popsiq:

quote:

Originally posted by BobApril:
Disclaimer - I haven't seen the Playboy article/photos. Just going by the AP story, though, she screwed up by posing in uniform and by making a point of her Air Force service. If the only mention of it had been "Occupation: Airman" on the back of the centerfold, then she'd have been fine.

Nonetheless, I'd be interested in seeing the actual charges - can they come up with anything better than "Conduct Unbecoming"?

If you check it out Bob, she retired from the Air Force, no charges. Her pics are now splattered all over the internet - Google her name. I hope she can dance because those photos and $4.68 will get her a latte. And so much for her service career, pension and bennies.

See Flanker's post above. We're not brilliant, the 'news' is a year 'old'.

PS I don't think she made the big picture.

What was the outcome, was she courtmarshalled?

But looking at the (supposed) FACTs, exactly what LINES did she cross in terms of UCMJ?

Isn't this issue quite Subjective, unless she was photographed doing something explicit (an act or something) I don't think this will be an "open and shut" case?

If she's indeed courtmarshalled and loses, I can see some specfic language being added to the books on conduct.

Like they updated regs concerning dress, hair, makeup, tatoos, fingernails...